Slowing down has a strange way of shifting your perspective. It nudges you into asking questions you may have brushed aside before. A big, unanswerable ones like, “What is all this for?”
Lately, I’ve found myself caught in that kind of spiral. The more I read and explore literature, the more these questions surface. And right when I needed it, The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus found me. This short yet heavy-hitting book echoed some of my darkest, most quietly unsettling thoughts.
Camus opens with a bold and chilling claim: “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.” From there, he lays out a theory of the absurd: the idea that human beings are constantly searching for meaning in a universe that offers none. It’s this confrontation between our desire for clarity and the universe’s silence that gives birth to the absurd. And once you see it, really see it, it changes everything. There’s no going back to autopilot.
Camus describes absurdity as not just a mental dilemma but a personal reckoning. He challenges us not to escape the absurd through religion or false hope, but to face it head-on. His version of rebellion is to live anyway. To create, to love, to keep going. Not because life has inherent meaning, but precisely because it doesn’t.
In this book, Camus argues that choosing death is, in a way, admitting that life isn’t worth the effort. This act, he suggests, stems from the feeling of absurdity, those moments when life feels ruled more by habit than passion, when our actions seem hollow, and meaning slips through our fingers.
Instead of surrendering, he invites us to rebel, not by denying the absurd, but by embracing it. He says we often “elude” the absurd with distractions, with hope, with illusions of meaning. But true freedom, he writes, lies in living without appeal, in choosing to keep pushing the boulder up the hill like Sisyphus. Not because it’s easy, but because it’s ours.
What The Myth of Sisyphus offered was something rarer: the courage to stare into the void and keep living anyway.
My Favorite Bits
- Beginning to think is beginning to be undermined. Society has but little connection with such beginnings. The worm is in man’s heart. That is where it must be sought. One must follow and understand this fatal game that leads from lucidity in the face of existence to flight from light.
- I can have peace only by refusing to know and to live, in which the appetite for conquest bumps into walls that defy its assaults?
- The mind, when it reaches its limits, must make a judgment and choose its conclusions. This is where suicide and the reply stand. But I wish to reverse the order of the inquiry and start out from the intelligent adventure and come back to daily acts. The experiences called to mind here were born in the desert that we must not leave behind. At least it is essential to know how far they went. (..) The absurd is born of this confrontation between the human need and the unreasonable silence of the world. This must not be forgotten. This must be clung to because the whole consequence of a life can depend on it. The irrational, the human nostalgia, and the absurd that is born of their encounter—these are the three characters in the drama that must necessarily end with all the logic of which an existence is capable.
- (..) struggle implies a total absence of hope (which has nothing to do with despair), a continual rejection (which must not be confused with renunciation), and a conscious dissatisfaction (which must not be compared to immature unrest). Everything that destroys, conjures away, or exorcises these requirements (and, to begin with, consent which overthrows divorce) ruins the absurd and devaluates the attitude that may then be proposed. The absurd has meaning only in so far as it is not agreed to.
- A man is always a prey to his truths. Once he has admitted them, he cannot free himself from them.
- Thus I return to Chestov. A commentator relates a remark of his that deserves interest: “The only true solution,” he said, “is precisely where human judgment sees no solution. Otherwise, what need would we have of God? We turn toward God only to obtain the impossible. As for the possible, men suffice.
Author: Albert Camus
Publication date: 26 November 2013
Number of pages: 192 pages
Leave a Reply