We rarely stop to think about democracy until we sense it slipping away. For years, we’ve assumed it’s a given, something that will always be there as long as we have elections and governments that claim to uphold it. But democracy is a system as well as a culture. It is a way of living and communicating with one another. And in the digital age, that culture is unraveling in ways we don’t fully understand.

The Paradox of Democracy tells the reader how much democracy depends on how we communicate. Today, social media has reshaped public discourse, and while it gives everyone a voice, it also drowns out thoughtful conversation with noise, misinformation, and manipulation. It’s unsettling to think about, but democracy carries the seeds of its own destruction. The same openness that makes it powerful also makes it vulnerable. If we don’t pay attention to the ways it’s being distorted, we could lose it. Slowly at first, and then all at once.

This book forces us to confront democracy’s contradictions. Democracy is supposed to give power to the people, but governments have always found ways to limit who gets to speak and who counts as a citizen. The freedom to persuade, to publish, to assemble. These are the pillars of democracy, yet they can also be used to manipulate, exclude, and even dismantle the system itself.

It’s not just politicians who shape democracy. It’s all of us. And yet, so many people feel disconnected from the political process, as if democracy is something that happens far away, decided by those in power. The book traces this struggle back through history, showing how even great thinkers grappled with democracy’s messiness. Plato saw it as nothing more than organized anarchy. Walter Lippmann believed in it but couldn’t figure out how to make it work. John Dewey recognized its flaws but insisted there was no better alternative.

The Paradox of Democracy argues that democracy is more than just a system of government. It’s a shared way of life, shaped by the values we uphold and the conversations we have.

Democracy is never finished, never secure, never something we can take for granted. It’s a process. Sometimes slow, often frustrating, but always worth fighting for. If we want to preserve it, we need to understand the forces working against it. And that begins with paying attention to how we communicate, how we engage, and how we choose to shape the world around us.

Summary

Democracy Is More Than Just Government

We often hear that democracy is defined by the right to vote and a government that upholds the law. But that’s only part of the picture. True democracy isn’t just a system of governance. It’s a culture of open communication.

To see democracy as a culture of free expression means recognizing both its potential and its risks. The very freedoms that define democracy also make it vulnerable. A functioning democracy requires its citizens to take responsibility for shaping the world they live in.

The Power of Communication in Democratic Societies

Democracy is about how decisions are made. The way people persuade one another, discuss ideas, and shape public opinion determines almost everything else. This makes media environments not just important but central to political life. The media doesn’t just dictate what we pay attention to; it influences how we think and engage with the world.

Today, democratic cultures are facing intense disruption. The systems that once mediated public discourse are changing, leading to disorder and uncertainty.

Democracy: A Work in Progress

Democracy has no fixed foundation. It’s not a destination but an ongoing process. A balancing act of power and free expression. It’s never fully secured, yet it remains the best political system we have, offering the hope that power can be checked and that diverse voices can be heard.

Throughout history, those in power have tried to limit public participation, shaping democracy through institutions and controlled narratives. As media scholar Robert McChesney points out, democracy has never been a gift from elites. It has always been something that people must demand, organize around, and fight for.

The so-called “crisis of democracy” isn’t really about democracy itself. It’s about the erosion of elite control over information. What we are witnessing is not the failure of democracy but the rise of illiberalism and a shifting media landscape.

The Greatest Challenge to Democracy: A World Without Gatekeepers

We are facing an unprecedented challenge to democracy. One that stems not from external threats but from the very openness we once celebrated.

With digital technology breaking down traditional gatekeepers, public discourse is no longer constrained by institutions that once shaped and filtered information. This radical shift means that reality itself feels up for grabs in ways we’ve never experienced before. The internet has removed barriers to participation, but in doing so, it has also unleashed chaos, making it harder to distinguish truth from fiction.

When Information Overwhelms Democracy

Democracy is more than about casting votes. It depends on informed citizens and open debate. But history has shown that whenever new forms of communication emerge, they tend to destabilize democratic politics. The more accessible media becomes, the more vulnerable societies are to demagoguery, distraction, and spectacle.

This pattern has played out time and again. Media evolves faster than politics, creating cycles of instability where public discourse is reshaped before democratic institutions can adapt. Today, with social media amplifying endless streams of conflicting information, confusion and cynicism have become widespread. Many people retreat into echo chambers, spreading misinformation rather than sifting through the chaos to find what’s real.

The problem runs deep. The very tools designed to empower democracy are now being used to undermine it. Plato’s critique of democracy anticipated this. He argued that its openness would always make it vulnerable to manipulation by those seeking power. And as history continues to prove, he may not have been wrong.

The Democracy Paradox: Freedom and Its Fragility

Democracy thrives on open communication. But that very freedom also makes it vulnerable. Political actors have always exploited new media technologies, using demagogic rhetoric to manipulate public opinion. This isn’t a flaw in the system; it’s an unavoidable paradox.

A society is either free or it isn’t. If it’s not free, it’s not a democracy. But if it is free, then all forms of rhetoric, truthful or manipulative, are permitted. The more open the flow of information, the greater the risk of democracy being destabilized.

This tension between chaos and order is not something democracy can escape. It defines every democratic culture, making democracy not a fixed state but an ongoing struggle to balance freedom with stability.

Democracy Unfiltered: The Collapse of Institutional Gatekeepers

For most of history, democracies have been democracies in name only, carefully managed by institutions that moderated public discourse, checked popular passions, and controlled the flow of information. These structures weren’t just safeguards; they shaped how democracy functioned.

But then came the electronic revolution, loosening those institutional controls. Digital technology shattered them entirely. Information is now decentralized, unfiltered, and uncontrolled. While this has empowered voices once marginalized, it has also unleashed disorder, leaving democracy more exposed, and more vulnerable, than ever before.

The Imperfect Nature of Democracy and Why It’s Worth It

Choosing democracy means accepting its slow, often frustrating nature. No system of self-governance is immune to miscommunication, inefficiency, or disagreement. But within those imperfections lies its greatest strength: the opportunity for cooperation. Democracy forces us to navigate differences, making it the foundation of human collaboration.

Anthropologist Robin Dunbar’s research suggests that social cohesion, equality, and stability are most naturally sustained in groups of no more than 150 people, a concept known as Dunbar’s number. In small hunter-gatherer societies, maintaining fairness and shared decision-making was more manageable. As societies grew, communication became more complex, and democracy became harder to sustain.

The implication is striking: early human societies may have been better suited for democratic cooperation than the vast, media-saturated world we live in today. With modern communication networks far exceeding our cognitive limits, achieving mutual understanding in democratic cultures has become an ever-greater challenge.

Media, Bias, and the Ever-Changing Landscape of Democracy

Media are inherently biased, not just in their political leanings, but in the way they shape society itself. The idea that “the media” favor one side or another is only part of the story. Journalism, at its best, serves democracy by informing the public about power and holding institutions accountable. But when it falls short, criticism isn’t just warranted. It’s essential for a healthy democracy.

Beyond individual biases, media technologies themselves shape political and cultural norms. Each new form of communication disrupts the existing order, forging new alliances, values, and economic opportunities. These shifts change how we receive information and redefine what democracy looks like.

None of this is new. Bias, disruption, and the struggle to maintain democratic ideals have always been part of the process. While perfect democracy may remain out of reach, learning from history can help us better navigate the challenges of today and prepare for those yet to come.

Democracy’s Short-Term Focus and the Challenge of Long-Term Thinking

In a democracy, the future is often reduced to the next election cycle. This short-term horizon makes it incredibly difficult to address long-term, systemic challenges, climate change being one of the most pressing examples. When political survival depends on immediate public approval, policies requiring sustained commitment often get sidelined.

Global media culture reinforces this bias. The rapid pace of news cycles and the constant demand for new stories make it difficult to focus on continuity over time. Urgent crises dominate headlines, while slow-burning issues struggle to hold attention. In a world shaped by instant information, democracy’s challenge is making decisions as well as learning how to think beyond the present moment.

Making Democracy Work: The Role of Communication and Collective Responsibility

For democracy to function, citizens must actively negotiate their shared reality. This can only happen through communication. While the modern world makes it feel like even reality itself is up for debate, that doesn’t eliminate the need for ethical discourse. It makes it more essential than ever.

Yet, today’s political engagement is largely transactional. Many citizens approach politics based on what they can gain or what they stand to lose, rather than seeing themselves as part of a collective effort. But democracy is more than the outcomes. It’s also about participation. Policies don’t emerge in a vacuum; they are shaped by the values citizens bring to the table.

The problem is that many people feel disconnected from the process. Alienated from their communities and estranged from political decision-making, it’s no surprise that apathy and resentment have become common responses. Rebuilding a democracy based on participation requires more than just elections. It demands a renewed commitment to communication, collaboration, and shared responsibility.

The Loss of Local Journalism and the Rise of Polarized Narratives

As local journalism declines, political discourse becomes flatter and more abstract. With politics increasingly nationalized, citizens turn to cable news and social media, where discussions are shaped by oversimplified Right-Left narratives. Instead of engaging with local realities, people are drawn into ideological battles over distant issues, deepening partisan divisions.

Print media, despite its own biases, has long provided space for deeper thinking and deliberation. Something the fast-paced, digital media landscape doesn’t allow. While newspapers can be manipulated like any other media, they require clarity and remain rooted in specific communities, offering a counterbalance to the fragmented and polarizing effects of online discourse.

Supporting print journalism is one way to resist this shift, but digital media’s disruptive power cannot be fully tamed. Social platforms like Facebook and Twitter will always carry risks, no matter how they are regulated. While efforts can be made to maximize their benefits and minimize their harm, they will never be entirely problem-free. The challenge, then, is learning to navigate them wisely rather than expecting them to be “fixed.”

---

Author: Zac Gershberg and Sean Illing

Publication date: 16 June 2022

Number of pages: 329 pages

---